Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persons whose speech recognition with hearing aids at 65 dB(SPL), WRS(65)(HA), is inadequate but whose maximum monosyllabic word recognition score (WRS(max)) is still measurable may benefit from a cochlear implant (CI). Using a validated prediction model, one can estimate word recognition with a CI, WRS(65)(CI), for these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) and stimulation parameters of the CI system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 37 patients were included. The WRS(65)(CI) was determined after 6 and 12 months and compared with the predicted WRS(65)(CI). The correlation of minimum and maximum electrical stimulation with the ECAP was investigated. RESULTS: All patients showed a significantly better WRS(65)(CI) after 12 months compared with the preoperatively determined WRS(65)(HA). The proportion of patients whose WRS(65)(CI) fell short of the predicted value by more than 20 percentage points was 19% after 6 months and 5% after 12 months. In the patient population, there was a closer correlation of the ECAP thresholds with the maximum than with the minimum electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: For patients whose speech understanding with hearing aids is inadequate-even with a very high preoperative WRS(max) in moderately severe hearing loss-CI fitting appears to be a promising treatment option. The predictive model enables individual treatment planning. Its application contributed to a quality of care that was higher than was found in an earlier retrospective study. The correlation found between stimulation intensity and ECAP in a cohort of patients with achieved predicted values supports the hypothesis that a fitting procedure based on ECAP and audiometry is a promising approach.