Does the location of the internal opening matter? A long-term retrospective study of the efficacy of FiLaC(®)

内口位置重要吗?FiLaC®疗效的长期回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of fistula laser closure (FiLaC(®)) in the treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula. METHODS: Data from Parks I-II cryptoglandular anal fistula patients in Parks I-II who underwent FiLaC(®) in our department between September 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, perioperative data, and postoperative data were collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in the study. The success rate at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 76.9% (40/52), 75% (39/52), and 71.2% (37/52), respectively. The differences between the internal orifice location subgroups were statistically significant (P = 0.013), with the anterior type demonstrating a lower success rate than the bilateral and posterior types. No statistically significant differences were observed between the subgroup of Parks classification and the treatment of internal orifices. All scores, including visual analogue scale pain score (VAS-PS), Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score (CCF-IS), and the quality of life in patients with anal fistula questionnaire score (QoLAF-QS), showed no obvious difference. CONCLUSION: FiLaC(®) technique can significantly relieve postoperative pain, reduce the incidence of anal incontinence and improve the postoperative quality of life in long-term follow-up. Patients with bilateral and posterior anal fistula are more likely to benefit from this technique.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。