Predictors of true appendicitis in pregnancy: a pathology-based 10-year cohort study

妊娠期真性阑尾炎的预测因素:一项基于病理学的10年队列研究

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of physical examination, ultrasonography (USG), and white blood cell (WBC) count in pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis and to determine which parameters are most significant in differentiating true appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases. METHODS: This hospital-based study involved pregnant women who underwent surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. Data were collected from patient records, including physical examination findings, USG results, WBC counts, intraoperative and pathological findings, and hospital stay duration. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathological diagnosis: those with confirmed appendicitis and those without. RESULTS: A total of 106 pregnant women were included in the study. Physical examination revealed that rebound and defense signs were significantly higher in the appendicitis group (p < 0.001). USG correctly diagnosed appendicitis in 66% of cases in the appendicitis group compared to 28% in the non-appendicitis group (p = 0.003). The mean WBC count was significantly higher in the appendicitis group (14.30 ± 4.77) than in the non-appendicitis group (12.37 ± 4.29) (p = 0.040). The average length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Physical examination, USG, and WBC count are valuable diagnostic tools in differentiating true appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases in pregnant patients. Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention can significantly reduce the risk of complications. However, a thorough evaluation is essential to minimize the risk of negative exploration.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。