Cardiac rehabilitation for elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis

老年冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的心脏康复:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); however, its specific effects on elderly CABG patients remain unclear. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the benefits of CR for elderly patients undergoing CABG. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data databases for prospective studies on CR interventions in elderly CABG patients, from study inception through February 19, 2025. Two independent researchers screened articles that met the inclusion criteria. Key outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and functional capacity. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: Six studies involving 621 patients were included. Interventions lasted between 6 and 12 weeks, with follow-up durations ranging from 6 weeks to 6 months. None of the studies reported data on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause hospitalization. Meta-analysis of HRQoL showed no significant improvements in either the physical component summary (WMD: 5.92 [-0.26, 12.1], p = 0.08) or the mental component summary (WMD: 5.92 [-0.14, 1.80], p = 0.28). However, individual studies suggested potential benefits of CR in specific functional domains. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found no statistically significant improvements in the physical or mental health components of HRQoL following CR in elderly CABG patients, based on limited short-term evidence. Some studies indicated potential benefits in functional capacity and physical activity adherence. Clinicians should consider individualized CR programs while acknowledging the existing evidence gaps. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251017085.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。