Safety and feasibility of the bowel-first versus conventional approach in intra-abdominal penetrating Crohn's disease: a propensity score-matched study

肠道先入路与传统方法治疗腹腔内穿透性克罗恩病的安全性和可行性:一项倾向评分匹配研究

阅读:4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penetrating Crohn’s disease (CD) is a severe phenotype marked by fistulae, abscesses, and complex intra-abdominal inflammation, often necessitating surgical intervention. Surgical management is particularly challenging in the presence of dense adhesions and severe mesenteric thickening. The bowel-first approach—where the diseased bowel is transected prior to mesenteric dissection—has been proposed as an alternative to conventional techniques, yet comparative evidence remains limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with penetrating CD who underwent elective intestinal resection at our center between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into bowel-first or conventional groups according to the surgical technique used. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on demographic, laboratory, and disease-related variables to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes were overall and major postoperative complication rates. Secondary outcomes included total operative time, bowel resection and anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included (91 conventional, 31 bowel-first). After matching, 31 patients remained in each group with well-balanced baseline characteristics. Total operative times were comparable between the bowel-first and conventional groups (211.13 (55.84) min vs. 239.39 (67.20) min; P = 0.077). However, bowel resection and anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the bowel-first group (48.71 (9.83) min) compared to the conventional group (65.81 (17.56) min; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (80 [50, 150] mL vs. 100 [50, 200] mL; P = 0.492) or postoperative hospital stay (10 [8, 20] days vs. 9 [8, 15] days; P = 0.676). Rates of overall postoperative complications (35.48% vs. 32.26%; P = 0.788) and major complications (6.45% in both groups; P = 1.000) were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: The bowel-first approach is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional surgery for intra-abdominal penetrating Crohn’s disease. This technique significantly reduces bowel resection and anastomosis time without increasing operative risk or length of hospital stay and may be especially advantageous for patients with severe mesenteric thickening or complex adhesions. Further prospective studies are warranted.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。