A single-center retrospective cohort study on the efficacy and safety of temporary endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction with endoscopic biliary stent

一项单中心回顾性队列研究,旨在评估临时性内镜下鼻胆管引流联合内镜下胆道支架治疗不可切除的恶性胆道梗阻患者的疗效和安全性。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stent (EBS) is the preferred palliative treatment for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). We tried endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) within 2 weeks after EBS to improve the adverse events and stent patency time after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A total of 285 eligible patients with unresectable MBO were divided into EBS group and EBS + ENBD group. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: The EBS + ENBD group (n = 74) was similar to the EBS group (n = 211) in clinical characteristics and improvement in liver function after ERCP. The two groups were also similar in terms of stent clinical success rate, incidence of postoperative cholangitis, postoperative bleeding and postoperative pancreatitis. 69 patients in the EBS group and 10 patients in the EBS + ENBD group were followed up continuously. The results showed that the EBS + ENBD group was higher than the EBS group in terms of stent patency time (246.1 days, 95% CI, 141.3-351.0 days vs. 195.3 days, 95% CI, 163.0-227.5 days; P = 0.420), but it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: For patients with unresectable MBO, compared with EBS alone, ENBD placement after EBS for temporary biliary drainage may improve liver function and reduce adverse events.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。