Optimizing blood management in burn surgery: a meta-analysis of tranexamic acid vs. placebo

优化烧伤手术中的血液管理:氨甲环酸与安慰剂的荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early debridement and grafting improve burn outcomes but pose significant blood loss risks. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, reduces hemorrhage without increasing Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. While widely used in other surgeries, its role in burn surgery remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates TXA's efficacy in improving surgical outcomes in burn patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Springer databases (last search: February 2025). Eligible RCTs compared TXA vs. placebo in burn surgery. Primary outcomes included blood loss (ml), transfusion need, hemoglobin change (g/dL), and hematocrit change (%). We conducted sensitivity, cumulative, and meta-regression analysis for all outcomes and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) for primary outcomes. RESULTS: We included five studies containing 227 patients. TXA significantly reduced operative blood loss (MD: -181.52 mL; p = 0.00; moderate certainty; I² = 61.46%) and transfusion need (RR: 0.52; p = 0.01; moderate certainty; I² = 0%). However, TXA did not significantly affect changes in hemoglobin (MD: 0.06; p = 0.94; low certainty; I² = 91.29%) or hematocrit levels (MD: 0.19; p = 0.90; very low certainty; I² = 88.94%). CONCLUSION: TXA significantly reduces total operative blood loss and transfusion needs with moderate certainty. However, it does not significantly impact hemoglobin or hematocrit levels. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences, including operative time, hospitalization length, and infection rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。