Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The management of paravebous sinus meningiomas that invade major venous sinuses is a subject of debate, particularly concerning the necessity of complete resection of the tumor and reconstruction of the venous sinus. This article aims to demonstrate the outcomes of total removal of the lesion (including the invading venous sinus portion) and the effects of restoring or not restoring venous circulation in terms of recurrence of the tumor, mortality, and post-operative complications. METHODS: The authors conducted a study involving 68 patients with paravebous sinus meningiomas. Of the 60 parasagittal meningiomas, 23 were located in the anterior third, 30 in the middle third, and 7 in the posterior third. Additionally, 3 lesions were located in the sinus confluence area, and 5 in the transverse sinus. All patients underwent surgery, and the degree of venous sinus involvement was classified into six types. For type I meningiomas, the outer layer of the sinus wall was stripped off. For types II to VI, two strategies were employed: non-constitutional, wherein the tumor and affected venous sinuses were removed without repair, and reconstructive, wherein the tumor was completely removed and the venous sinuses were sutured or repaired. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale and Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) were utilized to assess the outcomes of the surgical procedures. RESULTS: The study group of 68 patients underwent complete tumor resection in 97.1%, with sinus reconstruction attempted in 84.4% of cases with sinus wall and sinus cavity invasion. The recurrence rate of this group was 5.9%, with follow-up ranging from 33 to 57 months. It was found that the recurrence rate was significantly higher in cases with incomplete resection than in those with complete resection. The overall mortality rate was 4.4%, with all cases resulting from malignant brain swelling due to the failure to perform venous reconstruction after resectioning of the meningioma type VI. Furthermore, 10.3% of patients experienced worsening symptoms of neurological deficits or complete loss of neurological function, with a significantly higher incidence in those without venous reconstruction than in the venous reconstruction group (P < 0.0001, Fisher test). No statistically significant pre-operative and post-operative KPS differences were observed in patients with type I to V. However, in patients with type VI (who did not receive venous reconstruction), the post-operative KPS score was significantly worse. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest the necessity of a complete resection of the tumor, including the invasive venous sinus component, as the recurrence rate was found to be relatively low at 5.9%. Moreover, patients who did not undergo venous reconstruction showed significant deterioration in their clinical condition compared to other subgroups, thus highlighting the importance of venous sinus reconstruction.