Abstract
BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficiency of nephroscopy and cystoscopy in transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) for bladder stones (BS). METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 2021 for studies assessing the effect of different types of endoscopes among patients who underwent TUCL. The search strategy and study selection process were in accordance with the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no difference in stone-free rate (RR = 1.00, CI = 0.98-1.02, p = 1.00) between the two groups and nonsignificant heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%, p = 1.00), and all patients were rendered stone free. Use of the nephroscope significantly shortened the operative time compared with the cystoscope group (RR= - 26.26, CI = - 35.84 to - 16.68, p < 0.00001), and there was significant heterogeneity (I(2)= 87%, p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in mean urethral entries (RR = 0.66, CI = - 0.71 to - 2.04, p = 0.35), hospitalization (MD = 0.08, 95% CI = - 0.07 to 0.23, p = 0.31) or total complication rate (RR=1.37, 95% CI = 0.47-4.00, p = 0.56) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrates that both nephroscopy and cystoscopy have high stone clearance efficiency, low rates of complications and short hospitalizations. The mean urethral entries depend on the treatment method for large stone fragments. However, the use of nephroscopy can significantly reduce the operative time.