Informed shared decision-making or rigid eligibility and exclusion criteria for gene therapy for sickle cell disease?

对于镰状细胞病基因治疗,是应该采取知情共享决策,还是制定严格的资格和排除标准?

阅读:1

Abstract

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for sickle cell disease from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling and alternate donors is associated with excellent outcomes. HCT was implemented under restrictive eligibility and exclusion criteria because mortality was >10% in the early experience. These restrictive criteria were carried over to contemporary HCT and gene therapy (GT) clinical trials. Additionally, patients with chronic pain, stroke, psychiatric disorders, or adherence issues were excluded from GT trials. The United States Food and Drug Administration qualification of GT broadly identifies recurrent vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) as the indication and stipulates no exclusion criteria, thus raising the question of which criteria to use in clinical GT. Excellent overall and event-free survival, improvement in health-related quality of life, amelioration of VOE, and stabilization of cerebral vasculopathy following HLA-identical sibling donor HCT and GT justify broad application of GT in patients with a history of severe VOE, with shared decision-making guided by patient preferences while acknowledging gaps in evidence.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。