Abstract
In migraine trials pain relief responses from a headache at specific time points and sustained pain relief response over a period of time are important efficacy measures. When there are missing records of individual time point pain scores and/or headache recurrences during a migraine trial, the common approach used in practice to estimate the sustained response is statistically inconsistent even if the data are missing completely at random. Methods dealing with nonignorable longitudinal missing data usually assume certain models for the missing mechanism which can not be checked as they involve unobserved data. Taking advantage of the specific definition of the 'sustained pain relief' response, we propose two estimating methods based on intuitive imputation, which do not require model assumptions on the missing probability or specification of the correlation structure among the longitudinal observations. The consistency of the proposed methods is discussed in theory and their empirical performances are assessed through intensive simulation studies. The simulation results show that the proposed methods perform well in terms of reducing bias and mean square error except in several extreme cases which are unlikely to happen in real trials. The application of the proposed methods is illustrated in a real data analysis.