Atherogenic index of plasma and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

血浆动脉粥样硬化指数与冠状动脉疾病:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), a novel logarithmic index that combines fasting triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, is associated with the burden of atherosclerosis. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between AIP and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, severity, and prognosis in populations with and without established CAD. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception of each database to August 13, 2024. Cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and prospective or retrospective cohort studies using multivariate analysis were included. Given that the true effect size may differ across studies, a random-effects model for all analyses was applied. RESULTS: Fifty-one observational studies were included in this study. Patients with higher AIP were more likely to have CAD (odds ratio (OR): 2.79, 95% CI 1.75-4.45, P < 0.00001). Furthermore, these patients were more likely to have coronary artery calcification (OR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.74-3.00, P < 0.00001), multivessel CAD (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 1.50-2.77, P < 0.00001), and an increased risk of plaque progression (OR: 1.49, 95% CI 1.17-1.91, P = 0.001). In populations without established CAD, higher AIP levels were associated with an increased risk of Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (hazard ratio (HR): 1.28, 95% CI 1.22-1.35, P < 0.00001). Interestingly, this finding was consistent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (HR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.33-1.89, P < 0.00001) and patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stable CAD (HR: 1.65, 95% CI 1.15-2.37, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that elevated AIP is strongly associated with increased CAD risk, greater severity, and poorer prognosis in populations with and without established CAD. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the predictive performance and determine the optimal cut-off for AIP in different populations.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。