Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Non-interventional, cross-sectional pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To establish the validity and reliability of the BioStamp nPoint biosensor (Medidata Solutions, New York, NY, USA [formerly MC10, Inc.]) for measuring electromyography in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) by comparing the surface electromyography (sEMG) metrics with the Trigno wireless electromyography system (Delsys, Natick, MA, USA). SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab registry. METHODS: Individuals aged 18-70 years with cervical SCI were evaluated with the two biosensors to capture activity on upper-extremity muscles during two study sessions conducted over 2 days (day 1-consent alone; day 2-two data collections in same session). Time and frequency metrics were captured, and signal-to-noise ratio was determined for each muscle group. Test-retest reliability was determined using Pearson's correlation. Validation of the BioStamp nPoint system was based on Bland-Altmann analysis. RESULTS: Among the 11 participants, 30.8% had subacute cervical injury at C5-C6; 53.8% were injured within 1 year of the study. Results from the test-retest reliability assessment revealed that most Pearson's correlations between the two sensory measurements were strong (≥0.50). The Bland-Altman analysis found values of the signal-to-noise ratio, frequency, and peak amplitude were within the level of agreement. Signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 7.06 to 22.1. CONCLUSIONS: In most instances, the performance of the BioStamp nPoint sensors was moderately to strongly correlated with that of the Trigno sensors in all muscle groups tested. The BioStamp nPoint system is a valid and reliable approach to assess sEMG measures in individuals with cervical SCI. SPONSORSHIP: The present study was supported by AbbVie Inc.