Ophthalmic artery reversal predicts contralateral body weakness symptoms better than carotid Doppler velocity-preliminary results

眼动脉逆行比颈动脉多普勒血流速度更能预测对侧肢体无力症状——初步结果

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The measurement of blood velocity in the carotid artery has been the most popular noninvasive method of identifying and classifying carotid stenosis for half a century. Carotid stenosis is an indicator of elevated risk of stroke; anatomic revascularization reduces the chance of stroke by more than half. Controversy persists on how patients with severe carotid stenosis should be selected for anatomic revascularization. Patients with a connected circle of Willis (coW) might not benefit from anatomic revascularization; patients with two segments missing in the coW are most likely to benefit from revascularization. METHODS: Based on this analysis of data from carotid duplex examinations and transcranial Doppler examinations including ophthalmic artery (OA) direction in 28 patients, a refined carotid examination protocol is proposed. This refinement includes Doppler measurement of OA flow direction and documentation of internal carotid artery (ICA) bruit in addition to the adoption of an ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) criterion exceeding 350 cm/s for identification of the patient most likely to benefit from carotid stenosis treatment. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of OA direction or carotid bruit are 84.6%±5.4%, 71.4%±2.1% and for PSV >350 cm/s are 84.6%±5.4%, 59.5%±2.3% for predicting contralateral body weakness. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed examination can be performed with the same duplex scanner and scan head currently used for carotid examinations with little additional time.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。