Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advancements in medical technologies have led to the development of contact-free methods of haemodynamic monitoring such as remote photoplethysmography (rPPG). rPPG uses video cameras to interpret variations in skin colour related to blood flow, which are analysed to generate vital signs readings. rPPG potentially ameliorates problems like fretfulness and fragile skin contact associated with conventional probes in children. While rPPG has been validated in adults, no prior validation has been performed in children. METHODS: A two-phased prospective cross-sectional single-centre study was conducted from January to April 2023 to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and accuracy of obtaining heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) using rPPG in children, compared to the current standard of care. In Phase 1, we recruited patients ≤16 years from the neonatal and paediatric wards. We excluded preterm neonates with gestational age <35 weeks and newborns <24 hours old. The rPPG webcam was positioned 30 cm from the face. After 1 minute of facial scanning, readings generated were compared with pulse oximetry for HR and SpO(2), and manual counting for RR. Correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were performed. In Phase 2, we focused on the population in whom there was potential correlation between rPPG and the actual vital signs. RESULTS: Ten neonates and 28 children aged 5 to 16 years were recruited for Phase 1 (765 datapoints). All patients were haemodynamically stable and normothermic. Patients and caregivers showed high acceptability to rPPG. rPPG values were clinically discrepant for children <10 years. For those ≥10 years, moderate correlation was observed for HR, with Spearman's correlation coefficient (Rs) of 0.50 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.42, 0.57]. We performed Phase 2 on 23 patients aged 12 to 16 years (559 datapoints). Strong correlation was observed for HR with Rs=0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.85). There was weak correlation for SpO(2) and RR (Rs=-0.25 and -0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that rPPG is acceptable and feasible for neonates and children aged 5 to 16 years, and HR values in older children aged 12 to 16 years correlated well with the current standard. The rPPG algorithms need to be further refined for younger children, and for obtaining RR and SpO(2) in all children. If successful, rPPG will provide a viable contact-free alternative for assessing paediatric vital signs, with potential use in remote monitoring and telemedicine.