Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is an alternative for mid-low rectal cancer. In China, this procedure has been performed in high-volume centers with structured training curriculums. The efficacy of the TaTME structured training curriculums in China is still unclear. This multicenter study aimed to explore the effectiveness of the structured training curriculums in China. METHODS: Seven high-volume centers in China participated in this study. The first 25 patients who underwent TaTME in each center were enrolled. In the cohort, patients were divided into 3 groups. The first 5 procedures (group 1) were performed under proctoring according to the requirement of structured training curriculums. The latter 20 cases without proctoring were split into 2 groups (10 cases in each group, groups 2 and 3) according to the order of operation date. The baseline characteristics, perioperative complications, and pathological outcomes were compared between groups 1 and 2, as well as between groups 2 and 3. RESULTS: Symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 18.6% of the patients in group 2 compared with 5.7% in group 1 (P(1)=0.08) and 5.0% in group 3 (P(2)=0.04). Seven (11.3%) patients in group 2 developed defecation disorders whereas no patients had this complication in group 3 (P(2)=0.02). Compared with group 2, the operative time was shorter (235 vs. 223 min, P(2)=0.40), while the rates of intraoperative complications (15.7% vs. 5.7%, P(2)=0.10), postoperative complications (31.3% vs. 25.7%, P(2)=0.06), AL (20.0% vs. 8.6%, P(2)=0.04), and positive distal resection margin (DRM) (7.5% vs. 2.9%, P(2)=0.27) were lower in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the structured training curriculums was acceptable but needed further improvement. The prevalence of anastomosis-related complications and the quality control of specimens are still not optimal, and measures for refinement (for example, more cases under proctoring) are needed in the curriculums.