Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ARDS ventilator therapy with APRV or LTVV were identified using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and The Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) from inception to March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with a 405 patients were eligible for our meta-analysis. The results revealed that APRV was associated with lower hospital mortality [405 patients; odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.88; P=0.01], a shorter time of ventilator therapy [373 patients; mean difference (MD), 5.36; 95% CI, 1.99-8.73; P=0.002], and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (315 patients; MD, -4.50; 95% CI, -6.56 to -2.44; P<0.0001), better respiratory system compliance on day 3 (202 patients; MD, 8.19; 95% CI, 0.84-15.54; P=0.03), arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (294 patients; MD, 44.40; 95% CI, 16.05-72.76; P=0.002), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day 3 (285 patients; MD, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.10-5.25; P<0.00001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pneumothorax (170 patients; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12-1.34; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce hospital mortality, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, improve lung compliance, oxygenation index, and MAP compared with LTVV for patients with ARDS. We found APRV to be a safe and effective ventilation mode for patients with ARDS.