Comparative safety evaluation of silica-based particles

二氧化硅基颗粒的安全性比较评估

阅读:15
作者:Helene Kettiger, Didem Sen Karaman, Laura Schiesser, Jessica M Rosenholm, Jörg Huwyler

Conclusions

Physico-chemical properties promoting cytotoxicity and hemolysis were investigated. Our study revealed potential hazards of spherical amorphous SNPs.

Methods

We synthesized by a systematic approach 12 different types of SNPs with varying size, surface topology (porous vs non-porous), and surface modifications. We characterized these particles in terms of dry state and hydrodynamic diameter, specific surface area, and net surface charge (ζ-potential). For cellular studies, we exposed non-phagocytic (HepG2) cells, phagocytic (THP-1) cells, and erythrocytes to SNPs. Cellular uptake and stability of fluorescently labeled SNPs were analyzed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry.

Purpose

Silica nanoparticles (SNPs) are increasingly used as drug delivery systems (DDS) and for biomedical imaging. Therapeutic and diagnostic agents can be incorporated into the silica matrix to improve the stability and dissolution of drug substances in biological systems. However, the safety of SNPs as drug carriers remains controversial. To date, no validated and accepted nano-specific tests exist to predict the potentially harmful impact of these materials on the human body.

Results

SNPs with a porous surface and negative net surface charge had the strongest impact on cell viability. This is in contrast to non-porous SNPs. None of the studied particles induced oxidative stress in either cell lines. Particles with a negative surface charge induced hemolysis in a concentration-dependent manner. Conclusions: Physico-chemical properties promoting cytotoxicity and hemolysis were investigated. Our study revealed potential hazards of spherical amorphous SNPs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。