Background
Pregnant women, particularly in developing countries are facing a huge burden of preeclampsia (PE) leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. This is due to delayed diagnosis and unrecognised early targeted preventive measures. Adapting innovative solutions via shifting from delayed to early diagnosis of PE in the context of predictive diagnosis, targeted prevention and personalisation of medical care (PPPM/3 PM) is essential. The subjective assessment of suboptimal health status (SHS) and
Conclusion
Unlike OHS pregnant women, SHS pregnant women have high incidence of PE coupled with unbalanced levels of OS and AGMs at 10-20 weeks gestation. Combining early gestational profiling of OS and AGMs created an avenue for early differentiation of PE subtypes in the context of 3 PM care for mothers at high risk of PE.
Methods
A prospective cohort of 593 singleton normotensive pregnant (NTN-P) women were recruited at 10-20th (visit 1) and followed from 21 weeks gestation until the time of PE diagnosis and delivery. At visit 1, SHS was assessed using SHS questionnaire-25 (SHSQ-25) and women were classified as SHS and optimal health status (OHS). Biomarkers of OS (8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine [8-OHdG], 8-epi-prostaglansinF2alpha [8-epi-PGF2α] and total antioxidant capacity [TAC]) and AGMs (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF-A], soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 [sFlt-1], placental growth factor [PlGF] and soluble endoglin [sEng]) were measured at visit 1 and time of PE diagnosis.
Results
Of the 593 mothers, 498 (248 SHS and 250 OHS) returned for delivery and were included in the final analysis. Fifty-six, 97 and 95 of the 248 SHS mothers developed EO-PE, LO-PE and NTN-P respectively, versus 14 EO-PE, 30 LO-PE and 206 NTN-P among the 250 OHS mothers. At the 10-20th week gestation, unbalanced levels of OS and AGMs were observed among SHS women who developed EO-PE than LO-PE compared to NTN-P women (p < 0.0001). The combined ratios of OS and AGMs, mainly the levels of 8-OHdG/PIGF ratio at 10-20th week gestation yielded the best area under the curve (AUC) and highest relative risk (RR) for predicting SHS-pregnant women who developed EO-PE (AUC = 0.93; RR = 6.5; p < 0.0001) and LO-PE (AUC = 0.88, RR = 4.4; p < 0.0001), as well as for OHS-pregnant women who developed EO-PE (AUC = 0.89, RR = 5.6; p < 0.0001) and LO-PE (AUC = 0.85; RR = 5.1; p < 0.0001).