Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Splenic tumors are rare and are sometimes found incidentally. In such cases, laboratory tests and imaging studies should be performed based on the diagnostic algorithm to determine whether the tumor is benign or malignant. However, we clinicians sometimes encounter challenging cases. Herein we experienced two challenging cases of splenic tumor which we could not correctly diagnosis preoperatively. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A female in her 80s presented to our surgical department to undergo follow-up examinations for Stage IIIa ascending colon cancer. A follow-up CT scan showed marked enlargement of the splenic tumor which suggested metastatic cancer. We performed laparoscopic splenectomy. Case 2: A healthy female in her 50s presented to our internal medicine department to undergo a workup after multiple splenic tumors. A follow-up CT scan showed that the tumors had grown slightly. We could not completely rule out a malignant tumor. She rejected further follow-up study and chose splenectomy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: We experienced two cases of splenic hemangioma with different clinical presentations and imaging findings. Although some studies have reported that biopsying a splenic tumor is a safe and effective way of distinguishing among splenic tumors, in our country splenic biopsies are seldom performed due to fears of causing intraabdominal bleeding or tumor dissemination. Clinicians should consider whether it would be better to perform follow up with a biopsy or splenectomy as a definitive treatment on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy can be used for definitive management in cases involving malignancy or an uncertain etiology.