Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of robotic-assisted radical resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted radical resection for pCCA in our institute. METHODS: Between July 2017 and July 2022, pCCA patients undergoing robotic-assisted and open radical resection at First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were included. The short-term outcomes were compared by using propensity-scored matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-six pCCA patients were enrolled. After PSM at a ratio of 1:2, 10 and 20 patients were assigned to the robotic-assisted and open groups, respectively. There were no significant disparities in the clinicopathological features between the two groups. The robotic-assisted group had significantly longer operation time (median: 548 vs 353 min, P = 0.004) and larger total number of lymph nodes examined (median: 11 vs 5, P = 0.010) than the open group. The robotic-assisted group tended to have a lower intraoperative blood loss (median: 125 vs 350 mL, P = 0.067), blood transfusion rates (30.0% vs 70.0%, P = 0.056), and post-operative overall morbidities (30.0% vs 70.0%, P = 0.056) than the open group, even though the differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the negative resection margin, post-operative major morbidities, or post-operative length-of-stay between the robotic-assisted and open groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted radical resection of pCCA may get a larger total number of lymph nodes examined than open surgery. Provided robotic-assisted surgery may be a feasible and safe technique for selected pCCA patients.