Abstract
Nanofibrous materials are widely investigated as a replacement for the extracellular matrix, the 3D foundation for cells in all tissues. However, as with every medical material, nanofibers too must pass all safety evaluations like in vitro cytotoxicity assays or in vivo animal tests. Our literature research showed that differences in results of widely used cytotoxicity assays applied to evaluate nanofibrous materials are poorly understood. To better explore this issue, we prepared three nanofibrous materials with similar physical properties made of poly-L-lactic acid, polyurethane, and polycaprolactone. We tested five metabolic cytotoxicity assays (MTT, XTT, CCK-8, alamarBlue, PrestoBlue) and obtained different viability results for the same nanofibrous materials. Further, the study revealed that nanofibrous materials affect the reaction of cytotoxicity assays. Considering the results of both described experiments, it is evident that validating all available cytotoxicity assays for nanofibrous materials and possibly other highly porous materials should be carefully planned and verified using an additional analytical tool, like scanning electron microscopy or, more preferably, confocal microscopy.