Abstract
Due to the growing burden of fungal infections and a recent rise in antifungal resistance, antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is of increasing importance. The common methods of AFST have turnaround times of 24 to 48 h, and the available rapid methods are limited by applicability, cost-efficiency or accuracy. Given the urgency of adequate antifungal treatment in invasive mycoses, the need for the rapid and reliable detection of resistance is evident. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFST based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Twelve studies were reviewed, and data for the comparative analysis of their accuracy and methodology were systematically extracted. Compared to broth dilution as the gold standard, MALDI-TOF MS-based AFST reached a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 84% to 96%) and 95% (95% CI, 90% to 98%), respectively. A comparative analysis showed that the sensitivity was higher for the semi-quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization Biotyper antibiotic susceptibility test rapid assay (MBT ASTRA) technique (96%) than for the correlate composite index (CCI) approach (85%), which is based on spectrum changes. Turnaround times below eight hours reached better diagnostic values than longer incubation periods, qualifying MALDI-TOF MS-based AFST as a rapid and accurate method for the detection of antifungal resistance.