Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is diagnosed through histopathological and immunohistochemical examination of biopsies from skin or other organs. Its distinguishing features include perinuclear dot-like staining with Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and detection of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) using various methods. However, CK20 and MCPyV negative MCC cases have been reported at varying rates. In this single center cross-sectional study, we aimed to determine which clones are more effective in diagnosing MCC by comparing the performance of CK20 antibody clones Ks20.8 and SP33, as well as MCPyV antibody clones Ab3 and CM2B4. Fifty-four patients diagnosed with MCC were included. Among these, 42 cases were primary cutaneous, and 12 cases were nodal MCC. Fifty-two (96.3%) cases were positive with both CK20 clones, while two cases were negative. Clone SP33 stained areas of necrosis, whereas Ks20.8 showed no aberrant staining. MCPyV was detected in 44 cases (81.5%) using clone Ab3 and 39 cases (72.2%) using clone CM2B4. Staining with MCPyV clone Ab3 was diffuse and strong in most cases, while approximately 30% of CM2B4-positive cases exhibited low percentages and/or weak staining, complicating the evaluation. The two CK20-negative cases were also negative with both MCPyV clones. Our data demonstrated that CK20 clone Ks20.8 may be preferred for MCC diagnosis due to its consistent performance and lack of aberrant staining. Similarly, MCPyV clone Ab3 appears superior to CM2B4 for identifying MCPyV-positive cases.