Assessment the thermoforming effect on the physical and mechanical properties of different thermoplastic orthodontic retainers: An in vitro study

评估热成型对不同热塑性正畸保持器物理和机械性能的影响:一项体外研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As patients are instructed to wear thermoplastic retainers for the rest of their lives, the durability of the materials is a critical factor in evaluating whether the expense is justified. This study examined the physical and mechanical properties of three different thermoplastic retainer materials before and after thermoforming (BT and AT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clear Advantage Series I, Clear Advantage Series II, and Leone types were used, with each material having a thickness of 1 mm. The materials' tensile force, hardness, and water absorption tests have been measured for 90 thermoformed and 90 non-thermoformed specimens (30 specimens from each material). RESULTS: The tensile force, hardness, and water absorption values of all the materials differed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) BT. Additionally, the majority of the materials showed significant differences in water absorption, hardness, and tensile force (P ≤ 0.05) AT, except the Leone materials, and Clear Advantage Series I did not significantly differ in the case of hardness value. All studied materials showed an increase in hardness and water absorption AT (P ≤ 0.05). At the same time, all of the studied materials showed a significant decrease in tensile force after thermoforming. CONCLUSION: Thermoforming increases the material's water absorption while decreasing its stiffness, affecting its mechanical and physical properties. Clear Advantage Series II (PP) stood out with superior flexibility, wear resistance, and minimal water absorption compared to other materials, highlighting its durability and superiority.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。