Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To comparatively evaluate the ability of three different customized lingual appliance systems in achieving predicted results with respect to the mesiodistal crown tip, labiolingual crown inclination, in-out position of Maxillary permanent anterior teeth, and Maxillary arch form. METHODS: Three commercial houses: Incognito, iLingual 3D, and Lingual matrix were analysed in this study. The final sample size consisted of 42 cases. Fourteen digital prediction and posttreatment models of the maxillary arch were provided by three orthodontic offices each using a different system. Discrepancies between the prediction and posttreatment model in mesiodistal tip, labiolingual inclination, in-out position of anterior teeth, and arch form were analyzed. RESULTS: Incognito displayed the highest accuracy in all parameters except for in-out positioning. Lingual Matrix showed greater precision in achieving planned mesiodistal positions than labiolingual inclination while it was just the opposite for iLingual 3D. All three systems proved to be clinically reliable in achieving the predicted in-out positions of permanent Maxillary anterior teeth. CONCLUSION: These systems were considerably accurate in achieving planned treatment goals with minute deviations from the predicted value.