Abstract
Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents are one of the few medication classes that have demonstrated a clinical benefit in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, most literature utilized cisatracurium, and utilization of atracurium is limited to 1 small study. Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide further evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of atracurium versus cisatracurium for the treatment of ARDS. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort noninferiority study was conducted at 3 hospitals within a tertiary health care system. We included subjects diagnosed with ARDS who received either atracurium or cisatracurium for at least 12 hours. The primary outcome measured the change in PaO(2)/FiO(2) (P/F) ratio from baseline to 48 hours after initiation. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except for a higher median age and a higher proportion of subjects who were COVID-positive in the atracurium group. There were also some noted differences in the baseline P/F ratios. In a multivariable model adjusting for baseline characteristics, the change in the P/F ratio for atracurium was noninferior to cisatracurium at 24, 48, and 72 hours. A significant cost reduction, measured as cost per patient per day, was seen with the use of atracurium ($14.81-$25.16 vs $33.86-$41.91). Conclusion: Atracurium appears to be a safe and cheaper alternative agent in the management of ARDS.