Bridging the Gap: A Review of Pediatric to Adult Transition of Care in Liver Transplantation

弥合差距:肝移植中儿科到成人护理过渡的回顾

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With improvements in long-term graft function and survival, an increasing population of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients now require adult care. A process to successfully transition young adults to adult LT centers is supported in the literature with discussions on the rationale for health care transition (HCT), barriers to transition, stakeholder perspectives, and transfer readiness (TR). Results of outcomes studies are difficult to generalize and there remains no standard of care for HCT in LT. Of concern is that the youth's increasing independence occurs during a period of developmental vulnerability, with a threat to graft function due to risk-taking behaviors, specifically nonadherence, that may lead to rejection, graft loss, and death. OBJECTIVES/METHOD: The purpose of this comprehensive literature review is to discuss current knowledge, practices, and outcomes of HCT for LT recipients with additional support from literature in solid organ transplant (SOT) and pediatric-onset chronic conditions literature. RESULTS: Recent position statements in LT and SOT express a greater awareness of the importance of HCT with broad agreement that reflects a similarity in approach in endorsing HCT as an essential process that should be initiated in early adolescence with TR as a primary determinant of transfer; however, standardization with consistent outcomes measurement is lacking. The literature supports transition as an esential component of care that should be initated in early adolescence with programs that address knowlege, skill-development, and advocacy. The engagement of all stakeholders in LT is essential to program development. CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing awareness among the multidisciplinary team of the importance and role of the adult provider in extending transitional care into the adult setting as executive functioning skills mature. Outcome measures need to be clearly defined and standardized. Regulatory agency involvement to validate and support the need for TOC programs is crucial and should promote outcomes research for best practice program standardization.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。