In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Zabofloxacin and Other Fluoroquinolones Against MRSA Isolates from A University Hospital in Egypt

扎博沙星和其他氟喹诺酮类药物对埃及某大学医院分离的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的体外和体内活性

阅读:1

Abstract

The widespread of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has necessitated the search for alternative therapies; introduction of new agents being a suggestion. This study compares the in vitro and in vivo activities of zabofloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone, with moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of MRSA from patients hospitalized in the Alexandria Main University hospital; a tertiary hospital in Alexandria, Egypt, where zabofloxacin has not been yet introduced. The strains tested showed the highest percentage of susceptibility to zabofloxacin (61.2%) among the tested fluoroquinolones with the most effective MIC(50) and MIC(90) (0.25 and 2 µg/ml, respectively). Time-kill curve analysis revealed a rapid bactericidal activity of zabofloxacin after 6 h of incubation with a quinolone-resistant isolate and complete killing when tested against a quinolone-sensitive isolate with inhibition of regrowth in both cases. PCR amplification and sequencing of QRDRs in selected strains revealed the following amino acid substitutions: Ser-84→Leu in GyrA, Ser-80→Phe in GrlA and Pro-451→Ser in GrlB. The in vivo studies demonstrated that zabofloxacin possessed the most potent protective effect against systemic infection in mice (ED50: 29.05 mg/kg) with lowest count in the dissected lungs (3.66 log(10) CFU/ml). The histopathological examination of lung specimens of mice treated with zabofloxacin displayed least congestion, inflammation, oedema and necrosis with clear alveolar spaces and normal vessels. In conclusion, zabofloxacin was proved to possess high in vitro and in vivo efficacy encompassing its comparators and could be considered as a possible candidate for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the in vitro and in vivo activity of zabofloxacin against Egyptian MRSA clinical isolates. The widespread of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has necessitated the search for alternative therapies; introduction of new agents being a suggestion. This study compares the in vitro and in vivo activities of zabofloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone, with moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of MRSA from patients hospitalized in the Alexandria Main University hospital; a tertiary hospital in Alexandria, Egypt, where zabofloxacin has not been yet introduced. The strains tested showed the highest percentage of susceptibility to zabofloxacin (61.2%) among the tested fluoroquinolones with the most effective MIC(50) and MIC(90) (0.25 and 2 µg/ml, respectively). Time-kill curve analysis revealed a rapid bactericidal activity of zabofloxacin after 6 h of incubation with a quinolone-resistant isolate and complete killing when tested against a quinolone-sensitive isolate with inhibition of regrowth in both cases. PCR amplification and sequencing of QRDRs in selected strains revealed the following amino acid substitutions: Ser-84→Leu in GyrA, Ser-80→Phe in GrlA and Pro-451→Ser in GrlB. The in vivo studies demonstrated that zabofloxacin possessed the most potent protective effect against systemic infection in mice (ED50: 29.05 mg/kg) with lowest count in the dissected lungs (3.66 log(10) CFU/ml). The histopathological examination of lung specimens of mice treated with zabofloxacin displayed least congestion, inflammation, oedema and necrosis with clear alveolar spaces and normal vessels. In conclusion, zabofloxacin was proved to possess high in vitro and in vivo efficacy encompassing its comparators and could be considered as a possible candidate for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the in vitro and in vivo activity of zabofloxacin against Egyptian MRSA clinical isolates.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。