Abstract
Human research into psychological processes such as anxiety, depression, or loneliness typically involves accruing cases in which the phenomenon of interest is naturally occurring, and then comparing such a sample with control cases. In contrast, animal research designed to model similar processes to test mechanistic hypotheses typically involves inducing the phenomenon of interest via some exogenously (i.e., human) administered procedure. In the present review, the author proposes that naturally occurring animal models can complement induced models in understanding complex psychological phenomena. Advantages and disadvantages of naturally occurring versus induced models are described, and detailed examples of three naturally occurring models-for loneliness and health, behavioral inhibition and asthma, and social functioning and autism-are described, along with a formal program (the BioBehavioral Assessment program) at the California National Primate Research Center, that is designed to quantify variation in biobehavioral processes in infant rhesus macaques to facilitate development of naturally occurring models. It is argued that, because of the similarity in complex behavioral and psychological processes between macaques and humans, naturally occurring primate models provide a bridge between human studies and induced primate models and have the potential to identify new models for translational research.