Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring sleep-disordered breathing typically requires many sensors, including pneumoflow masks, measuring nasal and oral airflow, and esophageal pressure catheters. While these tools provide detailed information about airflow, effort, and respiratory mechanics, they can be uncomfortable, invasive, and less feasible for long-term, home-based, or large-scale sleep studies. In contrast, respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) belts offer a non-invasive and well-tolerated alternative. METHODS: In this study, we introduce four models that estimate key physiological signals from either RIP-belt data or pneumoflow mask data. Specifically, we present a heart rate model based on the RIP-belt signal, a nasal pneumoflow model estimating airflow from the RIP-belt signal, and two esophageal pressure models - one based on the RIP-belt signal, and the other one based on pneumoflow mask data. Data from 55 participants with varying degrees of sleep-disordered breathing were analyzed. RESULTS: When fitted to each participant individually, the heart rate model as well as the nasal pneumoflow model achieved a mean Pearson correlation of 0.60. The esophageal pressure model, using RIP-belt data, yielded a mean Pearson correlation of 0.65, while the model using pneumoflow mask data yielded a mean Pearson correlation of 0.52. DISCUSSION: Although these models do not replace gold-standard instruments, they provide physiologically interpretable estimates from non-invasive inputs and demonstrate potential for scalable, lower-burden sleep monitoring, and highlight the potential of considering physiological interconnectedness to extract desired information. Future work will focus on further validation and clinical diagnostic utility.