Background
PTPN2, a member of the non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases family, holds a crucial role in tumorigenesis and cancer immunotherapy. However, most studies on the role of PTPN2 in cancer are limited to specific cancer types. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PTPN2 in human cancers and its function in the tumor microenvironment.
Conclusion
Immune checkpoint PTPN2 is a powerful biomarker for predicting prognosis and the efficacy of immunotherapy in cancers. Mechanistically, PTPN2 negatively regulates the JAK/STAT and MEK/ERK pathways and the abundance of PD-L1.
Methods
To shed light on this matter, we investigated the expression level, prognostic value, genomic alterations, molecular function, immune function, and immunotherapeutic predictive ability of PTPN2 in human cancers using the TCGA, GTEx, CGGA, GEO, cBioPortal, STRING, TISCH, TIMER2.0, ESTIMATE, and TIDE databases. Furthermore, the CCK-8 assay was utilized to detect the effect of PTPN2 on cell proliferation. Cell immunofluorescence analysis was performed to probe the cellular localization of PTPN2. Western blot was applied to examine the molecular targets downstream of PTPN2. Finally, a Nomogram model was constructed using the TCGA-LGG cohort and evaluated with calibration curves and time-dependent ROCs.
Results
PTPN2 was highly expressed in most cancers and was linked to poor prognosis in ACC, GBM, LGG, KICH, and PAAD, while the opposite was true in OV, SKCM, and THYM. PTPN2 knockdown promoted the proliferation of melanoma cells, while significantly inhibiting proliferation in colon cancer and glioblastoma cells. In addition, TC-PTP, encoded by the PTPN2 gene, was primarily localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm and could negatively regulate the JAK/STAT and MEK/ERK pathways. Strikingly, PTPN2 knockdown significantly enhanced the abundance of PD-L1. PTPN2 was abundantly expressed in Mono/Macro cells and positively correlated with multiple immune infiltrating cells, especially CD8+ T cells. Notably, DLBC, LAML, OV, and TGCT patients in the PTPN2-high group responded better to immunotherapy, while the opposite was true in ESCA, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, and THCA. Finally, the construction of a Nomogram model on LGG exhibited a high prediction accuracy.