Feasibility of a rapid C-reactive protein chairside point-of-care test for detecting inflammation in exposed dental pulp: a pilot exploratory study

快速C反应蛋白床旁即时检测法在检测暴露牙髓炎症中的可行性:一项初步探索性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/AIM: Dental pulp inflammation is a critical condition in endodontics. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as patient pain history and percussion tests, often lack accuracy in reflecting the true status of pulp inflammation. This study explores the feasibility of using a rapid C-reactive protein (CRP) chairside point-of-care (POC) test as a potential adjunctive tool for detecting dental pulp inflammation. The findings provide preliminary insights to inform future larger-scale validation studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This pilot cross-sectional observational study included 20 patients with deep carious lesions. Blood samples were collected from exposed pulp tissue under sterile conditions and analyzed using the CRP rapid POC test (index test). Patient pain history (clinical reference test) and percussion test outcomes were documented. The study assessed feasibility and preliminary diagnostic trends based on test performance and associations with clinical indicators. RESULTS: The CRP rapid POC test yielded positive results in 55% of cases. Preliminary findings suggest a potential association between CRP levels and percussion test results (p < 0.001), while no significant correlation was observed between CRP levels and patient pain history. The test demonstrated an observed sensitivity of 94.3%, specificity of 87.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.7%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.9%. However, given the small sample size, these estimates should be interpreted with caution, and further research with larger cohorts is necessary for validation. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that the CRP rapid POC test may have potential as a diagnostic aid for detecting dental pulp inflammation. However, these findings are preliminary, and further validation through larger studies and gold-standard comparisons is necessary before clinical implementation can be considered.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。