Abstract
BACKGROUND: Groin ultrasonography (US) has been used as an adjunct to inguinal hernia diagnosis, but there is limited evidence as to whether its use affects surgical decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether groin US affects surgical management of inguinal hernia; the secondary goal was to estimate the frequency of groin US ordered before surgical consultation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 400 consecutive patients aged older than 18 years referred to 1 of 4 general surgeons in Calgary, Alberta, for inguinal hernia between January 2014 and January 2015. Bilateral groin examinations were entered as separate entries into the database. Outcomes assessed included the frequency of groin US examinations performed within 1 year before the general surgery consultation, presence of inguinal hernia on clinical examination (CE), presence of inguinal hernia on groin US, and whether the hernia proceeded to herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: A total of 476 groins in the 400 patients (354 [88.5%] male; mean age 53.5 yr [standard deviation 15.2 yr]) were evaluated for a hernia during the study period. Groin US was performed before general surgery consultation in 336 cases (70.6%). Overall, 364 (76.5%) of the hernias were clinically palpable; of the 364, 220 (60.4%) had preconsultation US, even in the presence of a positive CE finding. Of the 112 groins that did not have a clinically palpable hernia, 103 (92.0%) underwent preconsultation US. Of the 476 groins, 315 (66.2%) underwent inguinal hernia repair: 310 (85.2%) of the 364 with clinically palpable hernias and 5 (4.8%) of the 103 with clinically negative findings but positive groin US findings. Surgical decision-making based on CE findings occurred in 390 cases (81.9%) overall, whereas surgery based on groin US findings alone occurred in 5 of 336 cases (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Routine groin US was frequently performed before general surgery consultation, whether a hernia was detectable on clinical examination or not. Positive groin US results alone infrequently affected whether the patient proceeded to surgery. Clinical examination findings played a larger role in surgical decision-making than groin US results. Eliminating the practice of routine groin US may provide considerable health care cost savings.