Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Repair of midsize (4-6 cm) ventral hernias is challenging given lack of guidelines. Within this context, we sought to characterize surgical approach among patients undergoing repair of midsize ventral hernias within the only population-level, clinically-nuanced hernia registry in the US. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR). MSQC-COHR is the only US population-level registry that captures clinically-nuanced data pertaining to patient hernia characteristics. We included patients who underwent repair of a 4-6 cm hernia from January 1, 2020-June 30, 2022. We stratified repair type as open or minimally invasive and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with MIS approach. Secondary outcomes included complications rate. RESULTS: Among 771 patients, mean hernia width (SD) was 4.7 cm (0.8) and 339 (44 %) underwent MIS approach. Patients with MIS approach had lower BMI (33.5 vs 34.8, p = 0.02) and less often were ASA class III (47.5% vs 54.6 %, p = 0.02) or ASA class IV (2.4% vs 4.2 %, p = 0.02). MIS approach was associated with smaller mean hernia width (4.71 cm vs 4.84 cm, p = 0.02) and was used more often in the elective setting (94.4% vs 84.0 %, p < 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression model, higher BMI (aOR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94-0.99) and urgent/emergent surgery (aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.24-0.79) were associated with lower odds of MIS. We found no significant association between MIS and risk of complications (aOR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.37-1.04). Among patients undergoing MIS, more than half (n = 236, 69.6 %) had a robotic approach but there were few patient factors associated with this. CONCLUSION: Among patients with midsize hernias, few patient-level factors are associated with approach. This may indicate that surgeon preference factors largely into this decision.