Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure, with laparoscopic techniques offering advantages over open surgery. The extended Totally Extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique provides a larger working space compared to the traditional Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) approach, potentially improving outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted comparing eTEP and TEP techniques for inguinal hernia repair at Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune. Forty patients (20 in each group) aged 15-65 with uncomplicated inguinal hernias were included. Surgical procedures were performed based on patient preference. Data on surgical duration, pain scores, hospital stay, and complications were collected and analyzed using statistical methods. RESULTS: eTEP surgery had a significantly shorter mean duration (48.70 ± 7.505 minutes) compared to TEP surgery (74.20 ± 7.78 minutes; P = 0.00). Patients undergoing eTEP experienced lower mean pain scores (3.75 ± 0.55) compared to those undergoing TEP (5.15 ± 0.745; P = 0.00). Hospital stay following eTEP surgery was shorter (1.70 ± 0.657 days) than following TEP surgery (3.65 ± 1.137 days; P = 0.00). eTEP had lower incidences of hematoma and surgical emphysema but higher seroma complications. TEP surgeries were associated with more post-operative complications and a higher likelihood of requiring conversion to open surgery. DISCUSSION: The eTEP technique offers several advantages over TEP, including shorter surgical duration, less post-operative pain, and shorter hospital stays. However, TEP had more complications related to seroma. Individual patient factors and surgeon experience should guide the choice of technique. CONCLUSION: The eTEP technique appears to be a promising option for inguinal hernia repair, offering advantages over TEP in terms of surgical outcomes. However, further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and complication rates comprehensively.