Abstract
Chronic inflammation harbors a vulnerable substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation. However, whether the ABO blood types are associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation is unknown. A total of 2106 AF patients (1552 men, 554 women) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled retrospectively. The patients were separated into two groups according to the ABO blood types, the O-type (n = 910, 43.21%) and the non-O-type groups (A, B, or AB type) (n = 1196, 56.79%). The clinical characteristics, AF recurrence, and risk predictors were investigated. The non-O type blood group had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (11.90 vs. 9.03%, p = 0.035), larger left atrial diameters (39.43 ± 6.74 vs. 38.20 ± 6.47, p = 0.007), and decreased left ventricular ejection fractions (56.01 ± 7.33 vs. 58.65 ± 6.34, p = 0.044) than the O-type blood group. In the non-paroxysmal AF (non-PAF) patients, the non-O-type blood groups have significantly higher incidences of very late recurrence (67.46 vs. 32.54%, p = 0.045) than those in the O-type blood group. The multivariate analysis revealed the non-O blood group (odd ratio 1.40, p = 0.022) and amiodarone (odd ratio 1.44, p = 0.013) were independent predictors for very late recurrence in the non-PAF patients after catheter ablation, which could be applied as a useful disease marker. This work highlighted the potential link between the ABO blood types and inflammatory activities that contribute to the pathogenic development of AF. The presence of surface antigens on cardiomyocytes or blood cells in patients with different ABO blood types will have an impactful role in risk stratification for AF prognosis after catheter ablation. Further prospective studies are warranted to prove the translational benefits of the ABO blood types for the patients receiving catheter ablation.