Traditional versus Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Sacral Fracture Treatment in Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures

传统脊柱骨盆固定术与微创脊柱骨盆固定术治疗垂直不稳定型骨盆骨折中的骶骨骨折的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Numerous different fixation techniques are used to treat vertical shear sacral fractures. We report our experience with spinopelvic fixation using a minimally invasive technique. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with vertical pelvic and sacral fractures were treated with spinopelvic fixation (traditional open method, n = 21; minimally invasive technique, n = 17). Intergroup comparisons and statistical analysis were performed for intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative radiographic grading, post-operative functional score, and complication rates. RESULTS: Patients treated with the minimally invasive technique had a significantly shorter operative time (-52 min, p = 0.022), reduced blood loss volume (-287 mL, p < 0.001), and better cosmetic appearance (p < 0.05) than those in the traditional open group. There were no significant intergroup differences in post-operative radiographic grading (p = 0.489) or post-operative functional scores (p = 0.072). The complication rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (1/17 patients) than in the traditional open group (2/21 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation is a viable treatment for sacral fractures and can reduce blood loss and operative time.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。