Abstract
BACKGROUND: The anatomical location for lateral ligament reconstruction remains a significant challenge. With the development of arthroscopic technology, arthroscopic-assisted lateral ligament reconstruction can significantly facilitate the correct localization of anatomical points. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic ligament reconstruction compared with percutaneous ligament reconstruction. METHODS: This study included 72 patients who underwent lateral ligament reconstruction for chronic lateral ankle instability from 2018 to 2022. The follow-up duration in the percutaneous(n = 35) and the arthroscopic(n = 37) groups was 6-30 months. The patients were evaluated before the operation, at 6 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), Karlsson-Peterson score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were evaluated at each time point. The complications and the time required to return to sports were documented during the follow-up. RESULTS: All clinical evaluations significantly improved after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the AOFAS score, VAS score, and complications. The Karlsson-Peterson score (85.4 vs 83.6, p = 0.044), surgical duration (50.4 min vs 60.2 min, p < 0.001), and time to return to sports (17.8 weeks vs 20.5 weeks, p = 0.033) were all improved in the arthroscopic group. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved through both arthroscopic and percutaneous anatomic ligament reconstruction. The ligament remnant and anatomical localization point can be observed directly by using an arthroscope. Arthroscopic ligament reconstruction can be a more viable alternative for patients with chronic ankle instability due to its minimal disturbance to the stump of the ligament and reduced operative aggression.