Abstract
BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of severe and complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) commonly required three-column osteotomy (3-CO), which was technically demanding with high risk of neurological deficit. Personalized three dimensional (3D)-printed guide template based on preoperative planning has been gradually applied in 3-CO procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and precision of 3D-printed osteotomy guide template and free-hand technique in the treatment of severe and complex ASD patients requiring 3-CO. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective comparative cohort study of patients with severe and complex ASD (Cobb angle of scoliosis > 80° with flexibility < 25% or focal kyphosis > 90°) who underwent posterior spinal fusion and 3-CO between January 2020 to January 2023, with a minimum 12 months follow-up. Personalized computer-assisted three-dimensional osteotomy simulation was performed for all recruited patients, who were further divided into template and non-template groups based on the application of 3D-printed osteotomy guide template according to the surgical planning. Patients in the two groups were age- and gender- propensity-matched. The radiographic parameters, postoperative neurological deficit, and precision of osteotomy execution were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (age 36.53 ± 11.98 years) were retrospectively recruited, with 20 patients in each group. The preoperative focal kyphosis (FK) was 92.72° ± 36.77° in the template group and 93.47° ± 33.91° in the non-template group, with a main curve Cobb angle of 63.35° (15.00°, 92.25°) and 64.00° (20.25°, 99.20°), respectively. Following the correction surgery, there were no significant differences in postoperative FK, postoperative main curve Cobb angle, correction rate of FK (54.20% vs. 51.94%, P = 0.738), and correction rate of main curve Cobb angle (72.41% vs. 61.33%, P = 0.101) between the groups. However, the match ratio of execution to simulation osteotomy angle was significantly greater in the template group than the non-template group (coronal: 89.90% vs. 74.50%, P < 0.001; sagittal: 90.45% vs. 80.35%, P < 0.001). The operating time (ORT) was significantly shorter (359.25 ± 57.79 min vs. 398.90 ± 59.48 min, P = 0.039) and the incidence of postoperative neurological deficit (5.0% vs. 35.0%, P = 0.018) was significantly lower in the template group than the non-template group. CONCLUSION: Performing 3-CO with the assistance of personalized 3D-printed guide template could increase the precision of execution, decrease the risk of postoperative neurological deficit, and shorten the ORT in the correction surgery for severe and complex ASD. The personalized osteotomy guide had the advantages of 3D insight of the case-specific anatomy, identification of osteotomy location, and translation of the surgical planning or simulation to the real surgical site.