Abstract
In recent years, eye lens exposure among radiation workers has become a serious concern in medical X-ray fluoroscopy and interventional radiology (IVR), highlighting the need for radiation protection education and training. This study presents a method that can maintain high accuracy when calculating spatial dose distributions obtained via Monte Carlo simulation and establishes another method to three-dimensionally visualize radiation using the obtained calculation results for contributing to effective radiation-protection education in X-ray fluoroscopy and IVR. The Monte Carlo particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS, Ver. 3.24) was used for calculating the spatial dose distribution generated by an angiography device. We determined the peak X-ray tube voltage and half value layer using Raysafe X2 to define the X-ray spectrum from the source and calculated the X-ray spectrum from the measured results using an approximation formula developed by Tucker et al. Further, we performed measurements using the "jungle-gym" method under the same conditions as the Monte Carlo calculations for verifying the accuracy of the latter. An optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (nanoDot dosimeter) was used as the measuring instrument. In addition, we attempted to visualize radiation using ParaView (version 5.12.0-RC2) using the spatial dose distribution confirmed by the above calculations. A comparison of the measured and Monte Carlo calculated spatial dose distributions revealed that some areas showed large errors (12.3 and 24.2%) between the two values. These errors could be attributed to the scattering and absorption of X-rays caused by the jungle gym method, which led to uncertain measurements, and (2) the angular and energy dependencies of the nanoDot dosimetry. These two causes explain the errors in the actual values, and thus, the Monte Carlo calculations proposed in this study can be considered to have high-quality X-ray spectra and high accuracy. We successfully visualized the three-dimensional spatial dose distribution for direct and scattered X-rays separately using the obtained spatial dose distribution. We established a method to verify the accuracy of Monte Carlo calculations performed through the procedures considered in this study. Various three-dimensional spatial dose distributions were obtained with assured accuracy by applying the Monte Carlo calculation (e.g., changing the irradiation angle and adding a protective plate). Effective radiation-protection education can be realized by combining the present method with highly reliable software to visualize dose distributions.