Inefficiency, dignity and patient experience: is it time for separate outpatient diagnostics?

效率低下、尊严受损和患者体验不佳:是否应该实行独立的门诊诊断?

阅读:1

Abstract

There is international and national variation in the location of diagnostic imaging centres relative to hospitals. Diagnostic cross-sectional imaging has traditionally been performed within a hospital, catering for both inpatient and outpatients. The resulting two-tiered system caters for emergent and complex inpatients, in addition to typically ambulatory outpatients. These outpatients are less complex, and often attend an acute hospital for the specific purpose of diagnostic imaging. In both the UK and the Republic of Ireland, outpatient radiology is often provided on-campus in state-funded hospitals, reflecting the allocation of resources nationally. In many other countries, hospitals provide acute and high-level care, with community centres addressing outpatients' clinical and diagnostic needs. Mixing inpatients and outpatients introduces variability into the scanning process, and many institutions struggle to provide for the very different needs of outpatients. Current strategies of mixing these two fundamentally different groups should be reassessed, and either in-hospital segregation or dedicated outpatient diagnostic imaging centres merit serious consideration in any future healthcare planning.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。