Comparison of the short-term efficacy and safety of surgical operation of neoadjuvant sintilimab and camrelizumab, both in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study

比较新辅助化疗联合信迪利单抗和卡瑞利珠单抗治疗可切除非小细胞肺癌的短期疗效和手术安全性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has shown enhanced therapeutic efficacy and favorable surgical safety profile in the treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, there has been no academic research that directly compares the efficacy of two different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to evaluate the differences of the short-term efficacy and surgery-related safety of two different ICIs (sintilimab and camrelizumab), in conjunction with chemotherapy and followed by radical surgical resection in patients diagnosed with resectable NSCLC. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study involving patients. All patients diagnosed with NSCLC at Tangdu Hospital between June 2018 and March 2024, who received neoadjuvant therapy involving programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (specifically sintilimab or camrelizumab) in combination with chemotherapy and followed underwent surgical interventions, were consecutively enrolled in the study. Subsequently, in order to control confounding variables as much as possible, we innovatively employed two novel matching methods based on baseline characteristics: the 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method and the inverse treatment probability weighting (IPTW). We compare the efficacy and surgical safety of two different ICIs for patients with resectable NSCLC. RESULTS: In total, 239 patients were enrolled, including 134 patients in the sintilimab group (SG) and 105 in the camrelizumab group (CG). Before PSM, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate did not differ between the SG and CG groups (42.5% vs. 35.2%, P=0.25). Similarly, the major pathologic response (MPR) rate (55.9% vs. 60.0%, P=0.53) and the objective response rate (ORR) (73.1% vs. 66.7%, P=0.28) rate were not different between the groups. Binary logistic analysis revealed that squamous cell carcinoma was a promoter of pCR [P=0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15.2-77.6]. In total, 91 pairs of patients were matched by PSM. No differences were observed in the pCR rate (45.1% vs. 39.6%, P=0.45), the MPR rate (58.2% vs. 64.8%, P=0.36) and the ORR rate (75.8% vs. 67.0%, P=0.19) between the SG and CG groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatment of resectable NSCLC, sintilimab and camrelizumab demonstrated comparable short-term efficacy and surgical safety when administered in conjunction with chemotherapy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。