Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single or combined basal segmentectomy (CBS), excluding common basal segmentectomy, is the most difficult of all types of segmentectomies. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological prognosis between uniport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (UTBS) and triport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (TTBS). METHODS: This study retrospectively collected 300 patients who underwent thoracoscopic single or CBS at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2015 to May 2022, including 67 and 233 patients in the UTBS and TTBS groups, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding bias between the two groups. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, the UTBS group (n=64) had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the TTBS group (n=64) (20 vs. 30 mL, P=0.001). Other perioperative outcomes, including the operation time, number of lymph nodes and lymph node stations harvested, duration of chest tube drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, were comparable. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the operative time in the group underwent single basal segmentectomy (SBS) was significantly shorter compared to the group underwent CBS (110 vs. 120 min, P=0.002). There were 5 cases of recurrence in the overall cohort and no recurrence in the matched cohort. No deaths were observed in the overall cohort. Therefore, a survival analysis was conducted only for RFS in the overall cohort. The RFS rate and OS rate of the overall cohort were 98.3% and 100%, respectively. The surgical approach (UTBS vs. TTBS) was not an independent risk factor for RFS (HR: 1.120, 95% CI: 0.342-13.051, P=0.879). CONCLUSIONS: UTBS provided similar perioperative outcomes and oncological prognoses compared to TTBS.