Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is now recognized as tumor invasion. However, the association between STAS and procedure-specific outcomes (limited resection and lobectomy) in patients with pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is still under investigation. METHODS: To investigate whether limited resection predicts poorer survival in such patients, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features of a large cohort of 1,566 patients with stage I ADC from 2017 to 2020 and classified them according to STAS status and surgical method. Kaplan-Meier, Cox hazard proportional regression, and propensity score matching (PSM) were adopted for prognostic evaluation. RESULTS: STAS-positive patients had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in RFS and overall survival (OS) between limited resection and lobectomy, neither for the STAS-negative nor STAS-positive group before matching. After matching, limited resection was found to achieve comparable RFS to lobectomy in STAS-positive patients with pathologic I, IA, or IB stage tumor, (P=0.816, P=0.576, P=0.281, respectively), but worse OS in stage I and stage IB patients (P=0.029, P=0.010, respectively). Furthermore, in multivariable analysis, limited resection was not an independent prognostic factor of RFS or OS. Instead, the high-grade histological subtype was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS (P=0.001). In the subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) did not improve the outcomes of stage IB STAS-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection was associated with worse survival than lobectomy in stage I STAS-positive patients, but not in stage IA STAS-positive patients.