Abstract
In theoretical biology, robustness refers to the ability of a biological system to function properly even under perturbation of basic parameters (e.g., temperature or pH), which in mathematical models is reflected in not needing to fine-tune basic parameter constants; flexibility refers to the ability of a system to switch functions or behaviors easily and effortlessly. While there are extensive explorations of the concept of robustness and what it requires mathematically, understanding flexibility has proven more elusive, as well as also elucidating the apparent opposition between what is required mathematically for models to implement either. In this paper we address a number of arguments in theoretical neuroscience showing that both robustness and flexibility can be attained by systems that poise themselves at the onset of a large number of dynamical bifurcations, or dynamical criticality, and how such poising can have a profound influence on integration of information processing and function. Finally, we examine critical map lattices, which are coupled map lattices where the coupling is dynamically critical in the sense of having purely imaginary eigenvalues. We show that these map lattices provide an explicit connection between dynamical criticality in the sense we have used and "edge of chaos" criticality.