Abstract
(1→3)-β-d-Glucan (BDG) is a biomarker for invasive fungal disease. Until now, all BDG data in the Western Hemisphere were obtained using the Fungitell assay (FA). How it compares to the Wako β-glucan test (GT), which was recently launched in Europe, is largely unknown. We conducted a case-control study to compare the two assays in serum samples from 120 candidemia and 63 Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) patients. Two hundred patients with bacteremia or negative blood cultures served as candidemia control group. In patients with candidemia the median BDG values of the FA and the GT were 351 and 8.4 pg/ml, respectively. With both assays, the BDG levels in candidemia were significantly higher than those measured in the control group (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of candidemia were 86.7%, 85.0%, 6.0%, and 99.8% for the FA and 42.5%, 98.0%, 19.0%, and 99.4% for the GT, respectively. In PCP patients the median BDG values of the FA and the GT were 963 and 57.7 pg/ml, respectively. The sensitivities for PCP diagnosis were 100% for the FA and 88.9% for the GT. In practical terms, the GT proved to be robust and applicable for testing single samples, whereas for economic reasons the FA required the samples to be tested in batch. The sensitivity of the FA is superior to that of the GT. However, the GT is a valuable alternative to the FA, especially for patients with suspected PCP and in laboratories with low sample throughput.