Exophiala infection: A systematic review

外瓶霉感染:系统性综述

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the limited understanding of this rare fungal disease, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review of patients with Exophiala infections. METHODS: A systematic retrospective analysis was performed, including 248 articles involving 298 patients, retrieved from PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression by SPSS 27.0. RESULTS: A total of 19 Exophiala species were identified, with E dermatitidis, E jeanselmei, and E spinifera being the most prevalent. Common infection sites included subcutaneous tissue, lung, and skin, with distinct site predilections among different species. Central nervous system (CNS) infection was the only independent risk factor for mortality (P < .001, OR = 35.432). For E dermatitidis, the risk of infecting the skin (P < .001, OR = 0.075, 95% CI = 0.017-0.335) and subcutaneous tissue (P < .001, OR = 0.035) was significantly lower, while the risk of infecting the lungs (P < .001, OR = 44.850), CNS (P = .002, OR = 4.523), and blood (P < .001, OR = 12.498) was significantly higher. E jeanselmei showed a higher risk of subcutaneous tissue infection (P < .001, OR = 4.221) but lower risks of lung (P = .003, OR = 0.045) and CNS (P = .039, OR = 0.118) infections. E spinifera had a higher risk of infecting both subcutaneous tissue (P < .001, OR = 6.598) and skin (P = .006, OR = 3.778). CONCLUSIONS: Exophiala species exhibit distinct predilections for infection sites, and CNS infection is a critical risk factor for mortality. These findings may inform clinical diagnosis and management of Exophiala infections.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。