Enzymatic basis for hydrolytic versus phosphorolytic mRNA degradation in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis

大肠杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌中水解与磷酸解mRNA降解的酶学基础

阅读:1

Abstract

The rapid synthesis and breakdown of mRNA in prokaryotes can impose a significant energy drain on these cells. Previous in vivo studies [Duffy, J. J., Chaney, S. G. & Boyer, P. D. (1972) J. Mol. Biol. 64, 565-579; Chaney, S. G. & Boyer, P. D. (1972) J. Mol. Biol. 64, 581-591] indicated that while RNA turnover in Escherichia coli was hydrolytic, it was nonhydrolytic in Bacillus subtilis. Here we provide an explanation for these observations based on enzymatic analysis of extracts of these two organisms. RNA degradation to the mononucleotide level in E. coli extracts is due solely to two active ribonucleases, RNase II and polynucleotide phosphorylase, which act hydrolytically and phosphorolytically, respectively. RNase II activity represents close to 90% of the total activity of the extract, as expected for predominantly hydrolytic degradation in this organism. In contrast, RNase II is absent from B. subtilis extracts, and the primary mode of RNA degradation is phosphorolytic, employing the Bacillus equivalent of polynucleotide phosphorylase and releases nucleoside diphosphates as products. A low level of a Mn2(+)-stimulated, hydrolytic ribonuclease is also detectable in B. subtilis extracts. Overall, E. coli and B. subtilis extracts differ by about 20- to 100-fold, depending on the substrate, in their relative use of hydrolytic and phosphorolytic routes of RNA degradation. The relation of the mode of mRNA degradation to the environment of the cell is discussed.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。