Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of pedicle screw construction and locking compression plate fixation in posterior pelvic ring injuries analyzed by finite element method. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite element model of the spine-pelvis-femur complex with ligaments was reconstructed from computed tomography images. An unstable posterior pelvic ring injury was created, which was fixed with a pedicle screw construction or locking compression plate. A follower load of 400 N was applied to the upper surface of the vertebrae to simulate the upper body weight, while the ends of the proximal femurs were fixed. The construct stiffness, the maximum vertical displacement, the maximum posterior displacement, the maximum right displacement, and the overall maximum displacement of the sacrum, and stress distributions of the implants and pelvises were assessed. RESULTS: The construct stiffness of the pedicle screw model (435.14 N/mm) was 2 times that of the plate model (217.01 N/mm). The maximum vertical displacement, the maximum posterior displacement, the maximum right displacement, and the overall maximum displacement of the sacrum in the pedicle screw model were smaller than those in the plate model (0.919, 1.299, 0.259, and 1.413 mm in the pedicle screw model, and 1.843, 2.300, 1.053, and 2.895 mm in the plate model, respectively). The peak stresses of the implant and pelvis in the pedicle screw model decreased by 80.4% and 25% when compared with the plate model (44.57 and 34.48 MPa in the pedicle screw model, and 227.47 and 45.97 MPa in the plate model, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study suggested that the pedicle screw construction could provide better fixation stability than the locking compression plate and serves as the recommended fixation method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries.